My Letter:
I have come to believe that I was going about this all wrong. I do not
have
much info on your hypothesis. I am investigating your claim
further. It would help me in my research if you would answer
the
following questions.
1
Who is behind the HIV cover up?
2
What causes the deaths attributed to aids?
3
What is the motive for the cover up?
4 Why is your view more plausible than the mainstream?
5
Would you infect yourself to prove your point?
6
Since HIV was discovered in the 80s what role did the
Regan administration play in this cover up?
7
Debunk the debunkers. Why are so many doctors and scientists wrong? Your answers need to be specific and detailed.
If you take less than one to three paragraphs to answer each then you are probably
being glib and incomplete. Please answer these by either writing back to me or posting a blog. I know you care about this
issue. Thanks!
His answers and my responses:
Question one:
Hell, I can answer every single one of those questions..
1) Big Pharm.
ME: I asked the first question because I wanted to know who your "They" is. I was lying when I said
I was unfamiliar with AIDS denialism. I know that "Big Pharm" is your scapegoat and lord knows that they have a huge amount
of pull in Washington. They've already successfully made us all dope our kids up and believe that every moody day we have
means we're mentally ill but you have to be deluded to think they have as much power to pull this off. Hillary Clinton took
more money from this lobby than anybody and she was obviously their candidate. To pull off the AIDS cover up they would have
to own most of Washington and a large amount of the scientific community so why can't they get their candidate in office and
why is nobody else in government speaking out?
There are countries in Africa where half of the population has AIDS. Have you ever been there? I have a friend who
is a med student and worked in Swaziland treating AIDS patients. She would not take kindly to these statements. If the pharmaceutical
companies have sooooo much power than why aren't they forcing our government to do more for Africa? African countries don't
have much money but if they could sway U. S. public opinion then Africa would be a cash cow. Yet the country that spends more
money on foreign aid than any other stays out of Africa. Hmmmmmmmm.
Question 2:
2) Toxic pharmaceuticals, recreational drugs, and a generally unhealthy lifestyle.
Me: If these are the causes than how did people die with AIDS symptoms before 1987 when anti-viral
drugs were introduced? If drug use is the culprit why did it suddenly crop up in the 1980s? I would accept the possibility
of the hypothesis that heroin or morphine use caused AIDS if you could show me one factor that made this suddenly appear in
the 1980s. This one is kind of a no brainer in my opinion but people keep trying to make this stick. This is why I asked for
you to give one to three paragraph answers because once you get an explanation going you invariably sound like a complete
lunatic.
Question 3:
3)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$... Aids drugs cost nothing to produce but they sell them for an arm and a
leg.. It's all about the money...
Me: This would be true if the drugs didn't kill people like you claim. The drugs would be more profitable
if they could keep people alive. If HIV doesn't kill people then why would they make drugs that kill people? It would make
sense in the beginning because they would have had to convince people that HIV was lethal but it's been twenty years at this
point. Why would they do this? They apparently have the whole medical community, except for a few, either snowed or in on
the conspiracy so the danger is minimal and it could only increase their profits.
Question 4:
4)My information comes from people who have been studying AIDS since 1980.. Including a doctor who
holds patents on 9 protease inhibitors and the doctor who first isolated the cancer genome.. EVEN ROBERT GALLO has acknowledged
that there IS NO BETTER AUTHORITY IN THE WORLD ON RETROVIRUSES THAN PETER DEUSBERG.. And DEUSBERG says "HIV DOES NOT CAUSE
AIDS, NOR IS AIDS A CONTAGEOUS DISEASE"
IF IT WERE, we'd have about 60 million people in this country infected with it..
These people have nothing to gain from pushing their research.. It has cost them more than anything,
but still they try to move forward to get the truth out there whille big pharm and big gov PROFIT OFF OF DEATH
Realistically anybody who follows the paper trail cannot deny the corralation between drugs and AIDS..
But very few people actually do that research...
Me: This is not the question I asked. What I asked was for a logical argument using the scientific
principles of probability. Citing "experts" does not make a case. There are dudes with PhDs who support the 9/11 truth movement
and any other crackpot movement you can name. The scientific community only considers a hypothesis valid, at which point it
becomes a theory, when it is submitted to peer review and subjected to experimentation and study. Online alone there are over
400 hundred medical papers from established medical experts debunking the very claims you are supporting. These papers don't
just say, "Hey I think this is full of shit." They outline exactly why it doesn't hold up in great detail and most of these
are from peer journals written specifically for people with a background in biology.
Question 5:
5)David Rasnick already made that challenge.. He offered to inject himself with a purified, isolated
strain of HIV if another doctor would take a regiment of anti-HIV drugs and then under clinical observation determine who
develops AIDS-defining diseases first..
The other doctor DECLINED..
He knew what those drugs would do to him..
GNIKCUF KILL HIM..
I extend the same offer.. But not a single individual or clinic has accepted to take me up on it..
Me: According to CNN this ain't how that shit went down.
Question 6:
6) Cutting off funding from successful research linking AIDS and drugs and funneling all funds to
the virus theory, which has gotten us NOWHERE and accomplished NOTHING.. By their own words, "billions spent ....zero cured.."
Gallo still gets 30 million a year in federal grants.. While doctors who are curing the disease have
to function off private funding..
Me: I'm proud of you. You admitted that the conspiracy was not based on one party and that the Regan
administration was at least as corrupt as any other administration has been. But HIV is a virus. So is the common
cold. So is herpes. See any cures for those? Has a virus ever been cured? Nope. We've only ever been able to vaccinate against
a virus and that's what we're.....oh wait I forgot. You don't believe it's a virus. Sorry.
Question 7:
7) Several notable doctors and scientists have already done that.. 12 years ago two of the greatest
minds in the study of AIDS wrote "The Drug/AIDS hypothesis".. Over 80 pages with over 350 clinical references.. That explains
everything you would ever need to know about what AIDS is, where it comes from, why it spreads like it does and how it can
be cured.. And I have posted a link in your past blogs to a site where you can find endless literature.. Including books written
by people who know more about HIV/AIDS than any myspacer , clinical studies, interviews with scientists who have been working
on this disease for 30 years, and much much more.. The information is still out there, as much as they censor it still gets
through.. You simply have to look for it..
But before you do that, try to find one completed clinical study that proves that people with HIV
live shorter or less fulfilling lives than people without..
Then explain to me why Magic Johnson's wife never contracted HIV/AIDS
Explain why Liberace's live in lover never contracted it
Explain the same for Rock Hudson
Freddy Mercury the list goes on
THEN explain to me WHY THERE IS NOT A SINGLE AIDS PATIENT WHO IS NOT A USER OF RECREATIONAL OR PHARMACEUTICAL
DRUGS
Explain the presence of non-pathogenic HIV
Explain the cases of AIDS WITHOUT the presence of HIV
Once you've done all of that, you can explain to me why a disease that effects less than a million
people in this country annually - which makes it a fairly rare disease- is given any sort of priority at all?
Obama knows that AIDS is a money machine, and he plans to milk it for all that it is worth..
It's simple, really. Equate sex with death, install fear, extract funds.
Me: Yeah, I've read that shit. I'm not a doctor but at least I've been to college and taken biology
courses. Not my strongest subject but I can at least use logic and understand the basic concepts.
Magic Johnson's wife
probably hasn't contracted AIDS for two reasons one being that anti-virus medications reduces the chances of spreading the
virus and oh I don't know maybe......just maybe......fucking condoms!
I would use Magic Johnson as an example for my own case but as for the others you mentioned who the fuck knows? Maybe
they weren't having anal sex at all. Not all gay men have anal sex. Many of them just indulge in oral and oral sex has only
a small chance of transmitting the virus. (If the person has bleeding gums or mouth sores.) Also it's harder to get it if
you're a "top" than if you're a "bottom".
A lot of couples have normal sex lives for years when one partner is HIV positive. They just use condoms. On a personal
note I was in a relationship with somebody who had the herpes virus for several years. Guess what? I don't got it! I guess
herpes don't exist either.
Here is a list of AIDS denialists who have died of AIDS.
